Covenant University, Nigeria
* Corresponding author
Imhotep Architects Ltd, Nigeria
Curtis Energy Ltd, Nigeria
Sharetech consulting Ltd, Nigeria

Article Main Content

The sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the United Nations incorporated inclusive and quality education for all as a key component. In this respect, technology-based education is best suited for achieving the purpose. Meanwhile, energy is central to the modern school system as it is used to power Information and Communication Technology (ICT) equipment needed as bedrock for technology-based education. Given the low energy access in Nigeria and the need for environmentally friendly energy systems, the adoption of clean energy options appears to be the preferred direction for schools in the urban and rural areas. Hence this study examines the concept of energy transition especially as it relates to the school system and uses a case study to demonstrate its application in the context of Nigeria. The study adopted the qualitative approach using observation schedule and interview guide in addition to secondary data obtained from school documents, vendor specifications and technical details of clean energy installation. The study found that two main factors influenced the adoption of clean energy for the school. The first was the need to access a cheaper and cleaner form of energy in the long run given the epileptic and rather expensive supply from the national grid and the carbon intensive alternatives that are readily available. Secondly, the school wanted to align with the environmental sustainability preferences of the founders of the school, who are very conversant with best practices in sustainable development and sustainable school management. Hence, the transition to clean energy was an aspect of an overarching green agenda which encompasses different environmental sustainability activities. The major challenge is the huge capital outlay needed to install and maintain the clean energy system. The greening program provided school age children who will eventually become the policy makers of tomorrow, the proper orientation they need for their future roles as stakeholders in the physical environment. In addition, the high cost of installation and maintenance of the system suggests that incentives are needed to encourage an increased uptake of clean energy systems not only in the school system but also across other building types.

References

  1. Edwards B. Rough Guide to Sustainability. 1st ed. London: RIBA Publications; 2002.
     Google Scholar
  2. UNEP. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction; Towards a Zero-emission, Efficient and Resilient Building and Construction Sector, Nairobi: UNEP; 2020.
     Google Scholar
  3. RIBA. Built for the Environment: Addressing the Climate and Biodiversity Emergency with a fair and Sustainable Built Environment. London: RIBA Publication; 2021.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ibn-Mohammed T, Greenough R, Taylor S, Ozawa-Meida L, Acquaye A. Operational vs embodied emissions in buildings: A review of current trends. Energy and Buildings. 2013; 66: 232 – 245
     Google Scholar
  5. Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan. Commercial Buildings Factsheet, Pub. No. CSS05-05. Michigan: University of Michigan; 2021.
     Google Scholar
  6. US-EIA. Types of Energy used in Commercial Buildings. Washington DC: US-EIA; 2018.
     Google Scholar
  7. Gamarra AR, Lago C, Herrera-Orozco I, Lechon Y, Almeida SM, Lage, J, et al. Low-Carbon Economy in Schools: Environmental Footprint and Associated Externalities in Five Schools in South-western Europe. Energies. 2021; 14(6238).
     Google Scholar
  8. Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. Schools for Health: Foundations for Student Success - How School Buildings Influence Student Health, Thinking and Performance. Massachusetts: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; 2019.
     Google Scholar
  9. K12 Climate Action Commission. K12 Climate Action Plan 2021, Washington DC: The Aspen Institute; 2021.
     Google Scholar
  10. The World Bank. State of Electricity Access Report. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2021.
     Google Scholar
  11. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. A view inside schools in Sub-Saharan Africa: Regional Education Survey. Montreal: UNESCO Office for Statistics; 2013.
     Google Scholar
  12. Lawal I. 65% of Nigerian Schools lack Electricity, says UN Chief, The Guardian, 2017, July 20
     Google Scholar
  13. UNDESA. Electricity and Education: The benefits, barriers, and recommendations for achieving the electrification of primary and secondary schools. New York: UNDESA; 2014.
     Google Scholar
  14. Langthaler M, Bazafkan H. Digitalization, Education and Skills Development in the Global South: An Assessment of the debate with focus on Sub-Saharan Africa. Vienna: Austrian Foundation for Development Research (OFSE); 2020.
     Google Scholar
  15. RISE – Regulatory Indicators for Sustainable Energy. Sustaining the Momentum. Washington DC: The World Bank. 2020.
     Google Scholar
  16. IEA – International Energy Agency. Nigeria Energy Outlook. Paris: IEA. 2019.
     Google Scholar
  17. Netherlands Enterprise Agency. Solar Report Nigeria: Sector Study on Solar Renewable Energy in Nigeria. Netherlands: Ministry of Foreign Affairs; 2021.
     Google Scholar
  18. US-EPA. Energy Efficiency Programs in K-12 Schools: Guide to developing and implementing greenhouse gas reduction programs, Local Government Climate and Energy Strategy Series. Washington DC: US-EPA; 2011.
     Google Scholar
  19. Ahmed N, El-Dash KM. Impact of Sustainable Design in the Construction Sector on Climate Change. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2021: 12(2): 1375-1383
     Google Scholar
  20. Ragheb A, El-Shimy H, Ragheb G. Green Architecture: A Concept of Sustainability. Procedia Behavioural Sciences. 2016: 216: 778-787.
     Google Scholar
  21. US-DOE –US Department of Energy. A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings, Technical Report DOE/EE-1247. Washington DC: US Department of Energy: 2015.
     Google Scholar
  22. Isife TC. Environmental Problems in Nigeria: A Review. Sustainable Human Development Review. 2012; 4(1&2): 1-6.
     Google Scholar
  23. European Environmental Agency EEA. Environmental Challenges in a Global Context. In” European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Synthesis. Copenhagen: EEA; 2010.
     Google Scholar
  24. Embrandiri A, Kassaw GM, Gelo AK, Wogayehu BT, Embrandiri M. The Menace of single use plastics: Management and Challenges in the African context. In” Waste Management, Processing and Valorisation, Yaser AZ, Tajarudin HA, Embrandiri A. Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2022.
     Google Scholar
  25. Grough A, Lee JC, Tsang EPK. Green School Movement: An Introduction. In” Green Schools Globally: International Exploration in Outdoor and Environmental Education. Grough A, Lee JC, Tsang EPK. Eds. Springer, 2020: 1-21.
     Google Scholar
  26. USGBC- US Green Building Council. Building Momentum: National Trends and Prospects for High Performance Green Buildings. Washington DC: USGBC, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  27. Somwaru L. The Green School: a sustainable approach towards environmental education: case study. Brazilian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016; 3(10).
     Google Scholar
  28. Kats G. Greening America’s Schools: Costs and Benefits. Washington DC: Capital E; 2006.
     Google Scholar
  29. Ramli, NH, Masri, MH, Taib, MZM, Hamid NA. A Comparative Study of Green School Guidelines. Procedia Behavioural Sciences. 2012; 50: 462-471.
     Google Scholar
  30. Das O, Bera P, Moulick S. Water Conservation Aspects of Green Buildings. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2015; 04(Special Issue): 75-79.
     Google Scholar
  31. Plevyak L, Tamsukhin S, Gibson R. Building a Foundation for Sustainable Principles: Case Study of K-6 Green Ribbon Schools. Journal of Sustainability Education, 2019 December; 21: 1-19.
     Google Scholar
  32. Sucipto, Safitri R. School Infrastructure Green Environment. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Sciences. 2019; 353(012039).
     Google Scholar
  33. National Academy of Sciences. Review and assessment of the health and productivity benefits of Green Schools: Interim Report. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
     Google Scholar
  34. The Centre for Green Schools. Advancing Green Schools [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 July 1; Cited 2022 July 5]; Available from: https://www.centerforgreenschools.org
     Google Scholar
  35. Green Schools Alliance. Our Story [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 June 23; cited 2022 July 1]; Available from: https://www.greenschoolsalliance.org/about/history.
     Google Scholar
  36. Green Schools Initiative. About Us. [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 July 4; Cited 2022 June 5]; Available from: (https://www.greenschools.net/section.php-id=4.html
     Google Scholar
  37. Glow Initiative for Economic Empowerment. Climate Smart Nigeria, cited [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 June 15; cited July 5]; Available from: http://glowinitiative.org/climste-smart-nigeria/nccp/green-guild-school-initiative/
     Google Scholar
  38. The Green Institute Nigeria. Who We Are. [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 July 5; cited 2022 July 5]; Available from: https://greeninstitute.ng/who-we-are.
     Google Scholar
  39. This Day. Green Schools Initiative to the rescue [Internet]. 2019 [updated 2022 July 1; cited 2022 July 5]; Available from:
     Google Scholar
  40. https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2019/06/27.
     Google Scholar
  41. Geography Green Schools Project. Tracking the impact of climate change on the Environment. [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 July 5; cited 2022 July 5]; Available from: https://geogreenschool.gisknigeria.com/
     Google Scholar
  42. Onyedinefu G. DBN launches Green Clubs to drive positive Environmental Practices in Schools, Business Day [Internet]. 2021 June 9. [updated 2022 July 4; cited 2022 July 5]; Available from: https://businessday.ng/amp/news/article/dbn-launches-green-clubs-to-drive-positive-environmental-practices-in-schools/
     Google Scholar
  43. Somefun S, Awosope C, Abdulkareem A, Ojo J, Amuta E. Cost Implications analysis of grid supplied electricity and solar source of electricity in Nigeria. TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication, Computing, Electronics and Control. 2020; 18(6): 3258 – 3265
     Google Scholar
  44. Abdullahi D, Suresh S, Renukappa S, Oloke, D. Key barriers to the implementation of solar energy in Nigeria: A critical analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth & Environmental Sciences. 2017; 83(012015).
     Google Scholar
  45. Ohunakin OS, Adaramola MS, Oyewola OM, Fagbenle RO. Solar energy applications and development in Nigeria: Drivers and Barriers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014; 32: 294-301.
     Google Scholar
  46. Diemuodeke OE, Mulugetta Y, Njoku HI, Briggs TA, Ojapah MM. Solar PV Electrification in Nigeria: Current Status and Affordability Analysis. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering. 2021; 9: 1-25.
     Google Scholar
  47. Fatunde T. Universities embrace alternative power sources, University World News. [Internet]. 2019 [updated 2022 July 3; cited 2022 July 5]; Available from:
     Google Scholar
  48. https://www.universityworldnews.com/postmobile.php?story=20191002085603454Gamarra
     Google Scholar
  49. Rural Electrification Agency. About the Energizing Education Programme [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 June 12; Cited 2022 July 5]; Available from: https://rea.gov.ng/energizing-education-programme-2/
     Google Scholar
  50. GIZ. Supporting Renewable Sources of Energy at Universities in Nigeria [Internet]. 2019 [updated 2022 March 15; cited July 5]; Available from: https://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/82292.html.
     Google Scholar
  51. Egbe N, Gebhardt W. A solar off-the-grid school in Nigeria, EW Africa TV [Internet]. 2020 {updated 2022 March 18; cited 2022 March 20]. Available from: (https://amp.dw.com/en/a-solar-off-the-grid-school-in-nigeria/av-50875622
     Google Scholar
  52. St. Francis Catholic Secondary School Idimu. Planner and Yearbook 2021-2022. Idimu: St. Francis Catholic Secondary School; 2021.
     Google Scholar
  53. O’Malley JW. How the first Jesuits became involved in Education. In” The Jesuit Ratio Studiorum: 400th Anniversary Perspectives. Duminico VJ (Ed.). New York: Fordham University Press, 2000, pp56 – 74.
     Google Scholar
  54. Sosa A. Universal Apostolic Preferences of the Society of Jesus, 2019 – 2029. Vatican: Curia Generalizia Della Compagnia Di Gesu. 2019.
     Google Scholar
  55. Cotter K. Laudato Si: A Summary of Pope Francis’ Encyclical on the Environment [Internet]. 2015 [updated 2022 July 3; cited 2022 July 5]. Available from: https://diocesanpriest.com/summary-of-laudato-si-pope-francis-encyclical-on-the-environment/
     Google Scholar
  56. Google. Google map of Idimu, Lagos [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 June 29; cited 2022 July 5]. Available from: https://earth.google.com/web/@0.00000117,-57.19200149,1771.53580785a,22249981.21499777d,35y,0h,0t,0r
     Google Scholar