##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation on an indirect active type of solar dryer, using two distinct solar air collector and their impacts on drying agricultural products. The thermal performance of the proposed collectors has been evaluated using the first and second laws of thermodynamics. Experimental observations were done in climatic conditions Gödöllő, Hungary on the 2nd and 9th of October 2017. The experiments were also carried out to dry 2 kg of sliced apples spread over the drying trays. The mas flow rate of air was maintained as 0.038 kg/s and the dryer was operated from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. When a double-pass solar air collector's results are compared to a single-pass solar air collector's, it's evident that the double-pass solar air collector produces much more energy and efficiency. The experimental results showed that single-pass and double-pass collectors have daily efficiencies of 42.77% and 56.10%, respectively, with average exergy efficiency values ranging from 31% to 49% for single-pass and 51% to 67% for double-pass. The most significant aspect determining the collectors' thermal efficiency was the temperature rise between the collector outlet and inlet. The average drying efficiencies of the solar dryer for the single and double-pass collectors were evaluated as 12.16% and 16.45%, respectively. The maximum temperature rise for double-pass was determined to be 20 °C, whereas single-pass was found to be 6.5 °C. Furthermore, the highest drying rate was achieved when sliced apples were dried with a double-pass collector mode. It reduced 52% of the water content in the apple in the same amount of time as single-pass drying, compared to 35% in the case of single-pass drying.

References

  1. Gunasekaran N, Kumar PM, Raja S, Sharavanan S, Avinas K, Kannan PA, Gokul S. Investigation on ETC solar water heater using twisted tape inserts. Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 47, Part 15, pp. 5011–5016, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.586
     Google Scholar
  2. Fudholi A, Sopian K, Ruslan MH, Alghoul MA, Sulaiman MY. Review of solar dryers for agricultural and marine products. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010 Jan;14(1):1–30.
     Google Scholar
  3. Ajam H, Farahat S, Sarhaddi F. Exergetic optimization of solar air heaters and comparison with energy analysis. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2005 Dec;8(4):183–190.
     Google Scholar
  4. Afriyie JK, Nazha MAA, Rajakaruna H, Forson FK. Experimental investigations of a chimney-dependent solar crop dryer. Renew Energy. 2009 Jan;34(1):217–222.
     Google Scholar
  5. Halewadimath SS, Subbhapurmath P, Havaldar N, Hunashikatti K, Gokhale S, Experimental analysis of solar air dryer for agricultural products. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2015 Jun;2(3):1517–1523.
     Google Scholar
  6. El-Khawajah MF, Aldabbagh LBY, Egelioglu F. The effect of using transverse fins on a double pass flow solar air heater using wire mesh as an absorber. Sol Energy. 2011 Jul;85(7):1479–1487.
     Google Scholar
  7. El-Sebaii AA, Aboul-Enein S, Ramadan MRI, Shalaby SM, Moharram BM. Thermal performance investigation of double pass-finned plate solar air heater. Appl Energy. 2011 May;88(5):1727–1739.
     Google Scholar
  8. Al-Neama MA, Farkas I. Thermal efficiency of vertical and horizontal-finned solar collector integrated with forced air circulation dryer for apple as a sample. Dry Technol. 2019 Apr;37(5):546–558.
     Google Scholar
  9. Pardhi CB, Bhagoria J.L. Development and performance evaluation of mixed-mode solar dryer with forced convection. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering. 2013 Dec;4(1):1–8.
     Google Scholar
  10. Ramani BM, Gupta A, Kumar R. Performance of a double pass solar air collector. Sol Energy. 2010 Nov;84(11):1929–1937.
     Google Scholar
  11. Akpinar EK, Koҫyiğit F. Energy and exergy analysis of a new flat-plate solar air heater having different obstacles on absorber plates. Appl Energy. 2010 Nov;87(11):3438–3450.
     Google Scholar
  12. Yousef AAB, Adam NM. Performance and cost analysis of double duct solar air heater. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2012 Jul;1(6):108–116.
     Google Scholar
  13. Saidur R, BoroumandJazi G, Mekhlif S, Jameel M. Exergy analysis of solar energy applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012 Jan;16(1):350–356.
     Google Scholar
  14. Ahmadi MH, Nazari MA, Sadeghzadeh M, Pourfayaz F, Ghazvini M, Ming T, et al. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of performance evaluation of all the thermal power plants: A review. Energy Sci Eng. 2019 Feb;7(1):30–65.
     Google Scholar
  15. Duffie J, Beckman W. Solar engineering of thermal processes. 4th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2013, ch.1, pp. 12–13.
     Google Scholar
  16. Kurtbas I, Durmuş A. Efficiency and exergy analysis of a new solar air heater. Renew Energy. 2004 Jul;29(9):1489–1501.
     Google Scholar
  17. Esen H. Experimental energy and exergy analysis of a double-flow solar air heater having different obstacles on absorber plates. Build Environ. 2008 Jun;43(6):1046–1054.
     Google Scholar
  18. Bahrehmand D, Ameri M, Gholampour M. Energy and exergy analysis of different solar air collector systems with forced convection. Renew Energy. 2015 Nov;83:1119–1130.
     Google Scholar
  19. Singh S, Agrawal S, Avasthi DV. Optimization of design parameters of glazed hybrid photovoltaic thermal module using genetic algorithm. 2014 Innovative Applications of Computational Intelligence on Power, Energy and Controls with their impact on Humanity (CIPECH), 2014, pp. 405-410, doi: 10.1109/CIPECH.2014.7019059.
     Google Scholar
  20. Prasad K, Mullick SC. Heat transfer characteristics of a solar air heater used for drying purposes. Appl Energy. 1983 Feb;13(2):83–93.
     Google Scholar
  21. Doymaz I, Özdemir Ö. Effect of air temperature, slice thickness and pretreatment on drying and rehydration of tomato. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2014 Feb;49(2):558–564.
     Google Scholar